Further Reading
Anson, C. M. (2006). Can’t touch this: Reflections on the servitude of computers as readers. In P. Freitag Ericsson & R. Haswell (Eds.), Machine scoring of student essays: Truth and consequences(pp. 38-56) Logan: Utah State University Press.
Beach, R., & Friedrich, T. (2006). Response to writing. Reprinted from C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 222-234). New York: Guilford Press.
Blair, L. (2003). Teaching composition online: No longer the second-best choice. Kairos, 8(2). http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/8.2/binder.html?praxis/blair/index.html
Black, L. J. (1998). Between talk and teaching: Reconsidering the writing conference. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
Broad, B. (2003). What we really value: Beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
Breuch, L. A. (2004). Virtual peer review: Teaching and learning about writing in online environments. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Cho, K., & ; Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409-426
Cho, K., Schunn, C.D. & Charney, D. (2006). Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication, 23(3), 260-294.
Crank, V. (2002). Asynchronous electronic peer response in a hybrid basic writing classroom. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 30(2), 145-155.
Ericsson, P. F., & Haswell, R. (Eds.). (2006). Machine scoring of student essays: Truth and consequences. Logan: Utah State University Press.
Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Flash, P. (2002). Responding to student writing. Retrieved February 3, 2004 from University of Minnesota, Center for Writing Web site: http://cisw.cla.umn.edu/faculty/responding/index.htm
Haswell, R. (2006). The complexities of responding to students' writing. Across the Disciplines. http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/articles/haswell2006.cfm
Herrington, A., Hodgson, K., & Moran, C. (Eds.). (2009). Teaching the new writing: Technology, change, and assessment in the 21st-century classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hewitt, B. L. (2000). Characteristics of interactive oral and computer-mediated peer group talk and its influence on revision. Computers and Composition, 17, 265-288.
Honeycutt, L. (2001). Comparing email and synchronic conferencing in online peer response. Written Communication, 18(1), 26–60.
Kim, L (2004). Online technologies for teaching writing: Students react to teacher response in voice and written modalities. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(3), 304-337.
Lee, A. (2000). Composing critical pedagogies: Teaching writing as revision. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Lensmire, T. (2002). Powerful writing, responsible teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
Liu, J., & Sadler, R. W. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(3), 193-227.
Lipson, C. (2004). Doing honest work in college: How to prepare citations, avoid plagiarism, and achieve real academic success. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lu, R., & Bol, L. (2007). A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(2). Retrieved January 28, 2008 from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol
Melby-Mauer, J. (2003). Using e-mail assignments and online correction in ESL instruction.TESOL Journal, 12(2). 37-8.
Mellen, C., & Sommers, J. (2003). Audiotaped response and the two-year-campus writing classroom: The two-sided desk, the "guy with the ax," and the chirping birds. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 31(1), 25-39.
Menager-Beeley, R., & Paulos, L. (2006).Understanding plagiarism: A student guide to writing your own work. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Opdenacker, L., & Van Waes, L. (2007). Implementing an open process approach to a multilingual online writing center: The case of “Calliope.” Computers and Composition, 24(3), 247-65.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2009). Assessing the online learner: Resources and strategies for faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Palmquist, M. (2003). A brief history of computer support for writing centers and writing-across-the-curriculum programs. Computers and Composition, 20, 395–413.
Roberts, T. S. (Ed.). (2006). Self, peer and group assessment in e-learning. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Ruiling, L., Liu, H., Ren, Z. & Allen, D. (2004). Effects of Anonymous e-Peer Feedback vs. Identifiable Member e-Peer Feedback on College Student Writing Performance. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2004 (pp. 676-680). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Straub, R. (2000). The student, the text, and the classroom context: A case of teacher response.Assessing Writing 7(1), 23-55.
Tannacito, T., & Tuzi, R. (2003). A Comparison of E-Response: Two experiences; one conclusion. Kairos, 7(3)
Wasley, P. (2006). A new way to grade. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved January 28, 2008 from http://chronicle.com/free/v52/i27/27a00601.htm
Whithaus, C. (2005).Teaching and evaluating writing in the age of computers and high-stakes testing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Williams, B. T. (2007). Trust, betrayal, and authorship: Plagiarism and how we perceive students. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51(4), 350-354.
Williams, P., & Desmet, C. (2003). New computer editor "Emma" makes writing more productive for English students at UGA. Retrieved January 28, 2008 from
http://www.uga.edu/news-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=6&num=491
Yergeau, M., Wozniak, K., & Vandenberg, P. (2008). Expanding the space of f2f: Writing centers and audio-visual-textual conferencing, Kairos, 13(1)
Yuan, Y. (2003). The use of chat rooms in an ESL setting. Computers and Composition, 20(2), 194–206.
Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students’ reflective learning processes. The Internet and Higher Education
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.